Workdone software tutorial
![workdone software tutorial workdone software tutorial](https://www.shoutoutuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Depositphotos_11240768_l-2015.jpg)
Preparation: The reviewers individually prepare for group examination of the work under review, by examining it carefully for "anomalies" (potential defects), the nature of which will vary with the type of review and its goals. Overview of review procedures: The review leader, or some other qualified person, ensures (at a meeting if necessary) that all reviewers understand the review goals, the review procedures, the materials available to them and the procedures for conducting the review. Planning the review: The review leader identifies or confirms the objectives of the review, organises a team of reviewers and ensures that the team is equipped with all necessary resources for conducting the review. Management preparation: Responsible management ensure that the review will be appropriately resourced with staff, time, materials and tools, and will be conducted according to policies, standards or other relevant criteria.
![workdone software tutorial workdone software tutorial](https://www.projectmanager.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/190719_Blog_Feature_Problem_Solving-1600x900.jpg)
: The review leader uses a standard checklist of entry criteria to ensure that optimum conditions exist for a successful review. Differing types of review may apply this structure with varying degrees of rigour, but all activities are mandatory for inspection: The stipulated sequence of standard activities is largely based on the software inspection process originally developed at IBM by Michael Fagan. This standard applies distinctions between management review, technical review, inspection, walk-through, audit, etc. IEEE 1028 defines a common set of activities for "formal" reviews (with some variations, especially for software audit). IEEE 1028 generic process for formal reviews Informal reviews may often be unnecessarily expensive (because of time-wasting through lack of focus) and frequently provide a sense of security which is quite unjustified by the relatively small number of real defects found and repaired. Research studies tend to support the conclusion that formal reviews greatly outperform informal reviews in cost-effectiveness. 1028-1997 defines formal structures, roles and processes for each of the last three ("formal peer reviews"), together with software audits. Software review processes exist across a spectrum of formality, with relatively unstructured activities such as "buddy checking" towards one end of the spectrum, and more formal approaches such as walkthroughs, technical reviews, and software inspections, at the other. "Formality" identifies the degree to which an activity is governed by agreed (written) rules. Technical review is a form of peer review in which a team of qualified personnel examines the suitability of the software product for its intended use and identifies discrepancies from specifications and standards.
![workdone software tutorial workdone software tutorial](https://miro.medium.com/max/5104/0*hMATfmwBV00P72gY.png)
Walkthrough is a form of peer review where the author leads members of the development team and other interested parties go through a software product and the participants ask questions and make comments about defects.Inspection is a very formal type of peer review where the reviewers are following a well-defined process to find defects.
#Workdone software tutorial code
Pair programming is a type of code review where two persons develop code together at the same workstation.Code review is systematic examination (often as peer review) of computer source code.Software audit reviews are conducted by personnel external to the software project, to evaluate compliance with specifications, standards, contractual agreements, or other criteria.Software management reviews are conducted by management representatives to evaluate the status of work done and to make decisions regarding downstream activities.Software peer reviews are conducted by one or more colleagues of the author, to evaluate the technical content and/or quality of the work.Software reviews may be divided into three categories: 4 IEEE 1028 generic process for formal reviews.